memory alpha

User talk:Yaroze86/Archive 1

Ships in "Emissary" (DS9)

Timestamp 43:47 to 43:51

There are four reports of ships reporting neutrino disturbances near the Denorios Belt. Two of these ships are named. I think the first named ship is "Federation starship Yosemite"; I am not able to fully make out the name of the second ship. I have "Ferengi xxxx xxxx". What is your reading on these ships' names?Memphis77 (talk) 08:59, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Going to try and decipher this but it is super hard to read off P+. I am going to use this as a working section.

1st Report:Report xxx-xxx. Stardate xxxxx.x. Federation starship Yosemite reported long-range readings of [] (this looks to be a 2-part mineral of something 112) neutrino fluctuations in Bajor sector near Denoorios asteroid belt. Similar [] under file [].

2nd report:Report xxx-xxx. STARDATE 25475.4. Ferengi vessel Zetar/Setar forced to changed docking approach to DS9 because unexpected neutrino waves caused primary warp field disruption. See VCP [].

3rd report:Report xxx-xxx Stardate 425x3.3. Andorian transport vessel reported minor power failure near Denorios asteroid belt. Apparently caused by high band neutrino fluctuations in region.

4th report:Report xxx-xxx. Stardate 51538.3. Bajoran interplanetary shuttle forced to re-route on long azimuth approach to DS9 due to high levels? ‐ Yaroze86 (talk) 04:36, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

This is what I have:

Report xxx-xxx. Stardate xxxxx.x. Federation starship Yosemite reported long-range readings of high-[] neutrino fluctuations in Bajor sector near Denoorios asteroid belt. [] under file []. (full text can be best read at 43:50)

Report xxx-xxx. Stardate xxxxx.x. Ferengi vessel [] forced to changed docking approach to DS9 because unexpected [] neutrino [] caused [] warp field []. See [].

Report xxx-xxx Stardate xxxxx.x. Andorian transport vessel reported minor power failure near Denorios asteroid belt. Apparently caused by [] neutrino fluctuations in region.

Report xxx-xxx. Stardate xxxxx.x. Bajoran interplenatery shuttle forced to re-route on [] approach to DS9 due to high []

Memphis77 (talk) 19:08, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for helping me to decipher these texts. It was appreciated.Memphis77 (talk) 10:03, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

A new challenge

I have been adding names from the Protostar dedication plaque to the episode page for Last Flight of the Protostar, Episode 1. There are some names I am having trouble with. Here is the list, going from left to right. Could you figure out these names? None of these people listed worked on Prodigy as far as I can tell from IMDb.

1st column

2nd column

6th column

Good luck.– Memphis77 (talk) 04:23, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

It's possible some are friends and family of people who did work on it. -LauraCC (talk) 04:28, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
See below.

1st column

2nd column

6th column

‐ Yaroze86 (talk) 10:50, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you.– Memphis77 (talk) 00:37, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Done, some of these were pretty hard... ‐ Yaroze86 (talk) 13:41, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Again, thank you.– Memphis77 (talk) 21:54, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Planet Name

On the displays from the Dauntless, there is a planet name listed in the on mission - off the ship, in security data, and in crew members - medical. Can you help me with this? Thank you.– Memphis77 (talk) 00:37, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Here is the link: https://cdna.artstation.com/p/assets/images/images/077/438/778/4k/dominique-rossier-dominique-rossier-dauntless-ui-engineering-panel-3-5.jpg?1719441958– Memphis77 (talk) 00:37, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Get to working on this soon. This will be drastically more difficult due to the lack or resolution when zoomed in. ‐ Yaroze86 (talk) 11:34, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
So far what I have. Please feel free to add any you know as well to save me some time lol.... ‐ Yaroze86 (talk) 13:36, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

I am adding what I can to the above.

– Memphis77 (talk) 21:53, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

So I don't clog my talk page with redundant info I will add to your list and remove mine. ‐ Yaroze86 (talk) 23:50, 20 July 2024 (UTC)1

Could Imersia quardrant be "Origin Unknown"?– Memphis77 (talk) 17:08, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Could Korbin be Kaplan?– Memphis77 (talk) 17:22, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

I am not sure at the moment, but sometimes I see Klingon Quadrant. I do feel Kaplan is correct after looking at it more. ‐ Yaroze86 (talk) 19:24, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Could Chintoka be the planet between Qo'noS and Celtris III? – Memphis77 (talk) 21:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC) Could race be before planets ?– Memphis77 (talk) 21:43, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

I want to say it says "Name" then Planet then Sector. It might be Eclipse/Depsi (or something like this) Chintoka [UNKN] quadrant but I don't know what this would be a reference to? ‐ Yaroze86 (talk) 02:03, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

If you could don't create that planet yet. I am starting to lean towards it being Aleia ‐ Yaroze86 (talk) 21:22, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Alera (β) Final answer. ‐ Yaroze86 (talk) 22:06, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you.– Memphis77 (talk) 05:41, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Enterprise-B navigation console

Hi, do you have a version of this console where it is possible the read the labels for the locations? Thanks.– Memphis77 (talk) 06:26, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Are you one discord or anything outside of MA I could send you large scale images? Or I could upload to Google Drive or something? ‐ Yaroze86 (talk) 23:35, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

I have access to MA's discord page. My member name is Memphis77.– Memphis77 (talk) 00:05, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Found you and sent. ‐ Yaroze86 (talk) 01:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

I haven't used Discord much. Where did you sent the pics, and how do I access them? Thanks.– Memphis77 (talk) 03:06, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

I sent them as a direct message on discord itself. My account is same as my username as well if I remember. If you use the browser app click the top left game controller smiley logo and that is the direct messages. I sent them to memphis771794 ‐ Yaroze86 (talk) 03:15, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

I couldn't find the message in Direct Messages. I used the search engine, and came up with results that were anything but the message you sent me. I sent you a message from my account. Let's see if this works.– Memphis77 (talk) 03:41, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Talk:Cara

Do you concur? -LauraCC (talk) 01:39, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Working my way down the list. So far 2 have been from the comic series Albedo Anthropomorphics. There is potential this one might be as well. ‐ Yaroze86 (talk) 01:47, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Update. Everything under Monika Livingston are all connected to the Fusion and Albedo comics series. Alan Ferranti seems to be a reference to Alan Turing and the Ferranti Mk1 machine. Still researching the Alan and Miguel Aranda names. &dash Yaroze86 (talk) 02:38, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Unification article

Lots of details here -LauraCC (talk) 22:40, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Delete, rename, merge requests

I've noticed a couple times when you made some mistakes in trying to request or implement one of these, so I thought I'd lay them out here so you can know to avoid these mistakes in the future.

In the case of the "sector 5501" page, you suggested that it be renamed to sector 5561, but then you created that page instead of waiting for the page to be renamed, then switched the rename suggestion to a deletion suggestion. All this, without creating a talk page discussion, or a deletion discussion, to explain why and give a chance for discussion.

So, there are two points here. First, when you suggest a rename, don't then create the target page. If there's consensus for the move or there's silent consensus, you can perform the page move yourself, but this is different then creating a new page. Second, whenever you make a rename, delete, etc. request, create a place where you give your reasoning and where people can discuss it. In most cases, this is just a section on the talk page, but in the case of deletion nominations, this is done by following the link in the deletion notice and creating that page after adding your reasoning.

Also, there have been several cases where you've put pages up for deletion with {{delete page}} where {{delete}} would be more appropriate. {{delete page}} is for requesting deletion when a discussion is required. {{delete}} is for requesting speedy deletion for one of the reasons outlined here and doesn't require creating a discussion page for the nomination.

Finally, in the case of the USS Kelvin, you requested a merge, but then did the merge yourself and requested deletion. In this case, you should have waited for an admin to deal with it instead of making a separate deletion request, since deletion was required anyway. If need-be, you could have left a message on an admin's talk page to get their attention.

OK, sorry I wrote so much ;) Please ask if I need to clarify something. Also wanted to let you know I've left some of my thoughts about the Sector Ipai Relay Log transcription on Memory Alpha:Pages for deletion/Starbase 56. Other than that, I think Sector 5561 is actually "Sector 5567". Maybe that should be discussed on File talk:Sector Ipai relay log.jpg. 🖖 Mr. Starfleet Command (talk • contribs) 20:07, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

Noted on all cases. These things are what brought up the discussion about more admins couple weeks ago. I will take a look again at that specific sector again from frogland site as they have a clear view of it. Some of these was before I learned how to move pages in my earlier days for the most part. ‐ Yaroze86 (talk) 23:01, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Just checked, it is 5561. [10] ‐ Yaroze86 (talk) 23:06, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

OK, that confirms it – thanks for the link. 🖖 Mr. Starfleet Command (talk • contribs) 23:54, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

Sigma Draconis chart

Sigma Draconis system

Are the little brown marks next to the planets the Roman numerals of each one? -LauraCC (talk) 23:27, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

Beside the planet itself look to be just numbers 1 to 9. Edit: looks like there are actually moon markers though. If you look at number I think 4, you can see dots around the planet. ‐ Yaroze86 (talk) 23:35, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

Diagrams/image ideas

Perhaps a face-on version of the transparent aluminum diagram:

Macintosh displaying molecular design for transparent aluminum

Or the phylum search mode images. LauraCC (talk) 02:30, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

First one might not be too hard and looks kind of fun! The others would be kind of difficult as they are not great to get details from. ‐ Yaroze86 (talk) 03:00, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
Bashir and Garak search records
Here's another graphic for the Tozhat Resettlement Center. LauraCC (talk) 04:57, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
LAPD parking sign

The LAPD insignia from this sign image? Also, this [11] is missing -LauraCC (talk) 03:30, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

The Nazi logos I probably won't do. The LAPD logo seems like something I could do. I am not sure if it would be something that is to similar to an Okudagram. I stopped doing those at the moment till a consensus can be reached on the Forum. Hate to put a lot of work into something that has no use to the greater user base. Same for the maps. Yaroze86 (talk) 03:42, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Here is the progress so far. [12] When doing this it looks like the City logo was changed compared to the real one. ‐ Yaroze86 (talk) 18:27, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Toronto City Police
Nice. Toronto's too, if you're interested. LauraCC (talk) 18:31, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Here you go. Also of note, fairly sure that gun is a Walther PPK.
LAPD parking sign
‐ Yaroze86 (talk) 18:52, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
So I looked at the Toronto logo (I assume cause there is not a "real" Toronto City), I can't exactly make out the logo that it uses. Yaroze86 (talk) 19:47, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
Thanks anyway. :) LauraCC (talk) 20:04, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

Can you read this name?

Author of Plan Transitional Field Stress Factors, currently listed @ Unnamed Starfleet personnel due to illegible name. If it helps, it looks like the other names are production staff.

Sixth from the top, might end with an "A"[13] LauraCC (talk) 15:29, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

Looking into it and see if I can figure it out. I know L Brahms, A Probert, M Scott. There also looks like a K Brahms (This might have been a typo with L and K beside themselves). I will play around with it some and ee if I can get a name or play the Blu-ray I have and see if its clearer. ‐ Yaroze86 (talk) 01:08, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

T HIKITA Yaroze86 (talk) 03:58, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

Created. -LauraCC (talk) 16:54, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Image delete requests

Thanks for creating all those .svg images to replace the .jpg and .png versions. I'd like to ask you, though, that when you're replacing the images on the pages that use them you're cognizant of the foreign language versions of MA that are also using them. See the bottom of each image page under the "File usage" section for the "Global" section. If the images are deleted before the links are updated on each page under the Global section, it'll break those pages just as if the old image was still linked to an MA/en page. They should't have the {{delete}} tag added until all references are resolved. Thanks! -- Renegade54 (talk) 17:13, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

Do the foreign language pages all show up on "what links here" too? -LauraCC (talk) 17:22, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
No. 🖖 Mr. Starfleet Command (talk • contribs) 17:26, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
NVM, you can see it if you click on "global". Probably should have just looked. LauraCC (talk) 17:28, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
Until that "Global" section was added fairly recently, we had no way of knowing that a language version of MA had used a given image on one of their pages. At least now we have that! :) -- Renegade54 (talk) 17:44, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
Oh, it's new. Nice. Is there some kind of bot or whatever that can go through all the uses of the file and alter them when it's changed in one place? LauraCC (talk) 17:47, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
Well, there's a Dev Wiki script that updates file links when renaming a file, but (1) it only works on the wiki where the file is located, not external wikis where the file is used, and (2) you can't rename files from .png to .svg, so it would be useless in this case anyway. #1 could be fixed, but we'd need to bring it to the attention of the person/people who maintain that script and then hope they choose/have time to do the necessary legwork. #2 would likely be out of scope for that tool.
As far as a bot goes, the bot would need to be flagged as such on all the language versions. It would be nice to have such a bot at our disposal, but we'd need local consensus or admin approval on each individual wiki, which would be impossible at the moment given how inactive most of them are. So, for now, we just have to manually fix the links. 🖖 Mr. Starfleet Command (talk • contribs) 18:13, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
Are you referring to FileUsageAuto-update? I use it all the time, and as far as I know, there's no limitations on the rename (i.e. .png to .svg). -- Renegade54 (talk) 19:06, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
The limitations are built into MediaWiki itself, not imposed by the script. Renaming a PNG to .svg won't actually turn it into an SVG, so there's never a good reason to do so anyway. In fact, I'd wager you've never tried such a rename and thus never noticed that it's not possible ;) 🖖 Mr. Starfleet Command (talk • contribs) 19:41, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
No, I realize that you can't magically change a .png into an .svg by renaming it. I'm just saying that I think you could do the move (i.e. rename) and then replace the (now bad) file with a new version. -- Renegade54 (talk) 20:05, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
Yeah, I didn't mean to imply that *you* thought that, just added it for clarity. :) Anyway, I just tested it and my recollection was correct. The move failed with this error message:

The page could not be moved, for the following reason: The new file extension does not match its type.

🖖 Mr. Starfleet Command (talk • contribs) 20:32, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
Damn thing is too smart. Grrrr... :) -- Renegade54 (talk) 17:00, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
I assume the admins at the other pages would not care me replacing the "2D" versions with the new "more so 3d" versions? Yaroze86 (talk) 17:06, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
I guess we'll see! :) -- Renegade54 (talk) 18:11, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
Yeah, you can go ahead and update the links. If someone on another language edition doesn't like the new images, they can upload copies of the old images on that particular language edition and update things accordingly. So, in other words, just what Dennis said. :) 🖖 Mr. Starfleet Command (talk • contribs) 00:11, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
Sorry, I did not know that was a thing.... I was only told back in the day that "What links here" needs to be cleared beforehand. I will take a look and see and remove {delete} if needed. I will have to look and see if I am able to log into those wiki's and make the changes. I guess hardest part is do they use any copyright markers there as I do not speak/write any other languages. Yaroze86 (talk) 19:30, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
To clarify, MA/en acts as a central image repository for the other language editions, so images here automatically appear on the other MAs, so you don't have to upload any of your files on them or deal with their license templates. Just fixing the file links in their pages is sufficient.
Also, I think you're automatically logged on to all Fandom wikis, and if not, you'll still be able to use the same login credentials as on MA/en. 🖖 Mr. Starfleet Command (talk • contribs) 19:33, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
This discussion could probably be moved to a more general talk page about files/name changes/uploads, etc., given the subject's applicability. LauraCC (talk) 20:41, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
I don't think that's necessary. Perhaps some help pages/etc. need updating to note some of these things, but that's about it. No need to move this discussion IMO. 🖖 Mr. Starfleet Command (talk • contribs) 20:47, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
Yeah, okay. LauraCC (talk) 20:49, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
Yeah, it's fine here as a reminder for me to fix these. Yaroze86 (talk) 21:00, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

Started working on these. ‐ Yaroze86 (talk) 22:42, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

"____ Outdoor Advertising"

Cetacean Institute bus ad

What is the name underneath the whales' tails? -LauraCC (talk) 03:43, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Ill have to look and see if its better than the screencaps online Yaroze86 (talk) 04:08, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Three new challenges

I am asking for help in the SFA star charts. There is no rush.

To help you, above the Kelpa, there are two real world systems - Sadalbari and Grumium. There is a third one, right between these two, but there isn't enough to decipher what it is.

Thanks.Memphis77 (talk) 08:54, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

I will post as I figure them out.
New Xindus per the Stellar Cartography. Yaroze86 (talk) 11:59, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you.Memphis77 (talk) 12:52, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

To the left of Xi Dr, and Mu Peg would be Markab Yaroze86 (talk) 15:11, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Some others out in that area that are labeled are is Xi Cep, Alpha Lac, 32 Iota Cep, 23 And, 10 Kap Peg, 37 Mu AndYaroze86 (talk) 15:19, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
The Star behind the M in Omega-47 looks to be Eta Aquarii Yaroze86 (talk) 15:26, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
I think you Might also be refering to the one located by the ON in ZONE from VENARI RAL ZONE, that would be Gavaria per the Stella. ‐ Yaroze86 (talk) 17:00, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. I appreciate it very much. I needed help with those systems on the edge as it is hard to find a map of the real-world galaxy that does the same thing as the Star Charts.Memphis77 (talk) 17:55, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

I am starting with this project, but fair warning, it's a lot of data points, redo all the text, complete system names.... its a lot. Yaroze86 (talk) 19:29, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Current progress. Somethings have moved it seems. Like the Chantico Nebula and Kiley upon initial looking at it. [14] (BG note, the red circles are from the combined star chart I was working on before MA said we didn't need it. Most of those come from the Enterprise star chart and SS Elaos) ‐ Yaroze86 (talk) 16:31, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Also under the Miyazaki it says (Graveyard) ‐ Yaroze86 (talk) 17:43, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Observations and questions from Rubincon.

Thank you. Memphis77 (talk) 20:09, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Driving at the moment but this should help you a lot till I can get mind completed. [15] Yaroze86 (talk) 00:01, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Thank you.Memphis77 (talk) 00:21, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Does that clear up alot for you? Yaroze86 (talk) 03:05, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Yes.Memphis77 (talk) 07:15, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
I have a bigger challenge for you. What can you do with the star chart that has the label Ckaptir Space on it? This chart shows more of the A/B Quadrant.Memphis77 (talk) 07:24, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Do you have a time stamp? Yaroze86 (talk) 14:32, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
Some progress to the right side of the map. [16] Yaroze86 (talk) 15:21, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
Above Delta Doradus is OSNULLUS HOMEWORLD Yaroze86 (talk) 18:31, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
The ones that have dotted lines are Trans. Wormhole I believe. Yaroze86 (talk) 19:46, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
I read the text as "Trans Warp Hub".

Memphis77 (talk) 19:59, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

From one that I can align its KAPPA PEGASI to MU ANDROMEDAE (There is also one near this one that is little inbound and to the north. I'll look around and see if I can figure it out as well. But I am unsure at this point if they are duplicates or actual new systems we need to put in. Furthest northwest is Deep Space 3 Yaroze86 (talk) 20:23, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
[19] Going by this makes it look like there are more systems than really there are. Most of those are duplicates of it coming into focus if these are what you are referring too. Yaroze86 (talk) 00:34, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
I am referring to the narrow band of named systems that fall under Omega, to the left of Ferengi Trade Zone and Cardassian Space. They could be duplicates of what is named systems. It is hard to read the labels.Memphis77 (talk) 01:36, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
I noted on one of the charts that you left one system unidentified. This system was "under" Starbase 173. In "Ko'Zeine", at timestamp 37:19 to 37:30, there is a star chart showing the area where Starbase 173 is. This might halp with the identification of this system. [20]Memphis77 (talk) 01:36, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
Early in the thread, there was a mention of Xi Cep, Alpha Lac, 32 Iota Cep, and 23 And. Where are these star systems located on the charts? Thanks and I appreciate the help.Memphis77 (talk) 01:40, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
Should be able to get you the 5 left side grid boxes tomorrow. 90% done with them. So far everything on the Stella Cart from what I remember is there on that side with a few additions here and there. I would ignore Xi Cep, Alpha Lac, 32 Iota Cep, and 23 And at the moment as I think initially I had an alignment problem thanks to them moving the nebula's and R'ONGOVIA and PROSPERO..... Yaroze86 (talk) 04:27, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
[21] Still working around the Alpha Majoris area. Please let me know if you see any errors. Please ignore the Starbases at the moment. Yaroze86 (talk) 14:35, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
Q'Mau is below Gamma Coronae Borealis. Starbase 14 is on the other side of First Federation space. 86 Aquarii is not at that location. The Kitolian Belt runs through The neutron star is named Evertt 3. [22] Quan is above Gemulon. Kaminar is above Merak. Below Iadora is Illyria, then Starbase 17, then Hetemit.In that area, there is Alrescha, and Upsilon Ursae Majoris.Memphis77 (talk) 16:15, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
There is something quite long under Gamma Coronae Borealis that goes under the circle of 60 Bet Oph. (I think DISCO had a homeworld in this area???)
"The Kitolian Belt runs through The neutron star is named Evertt 3" Is this the Belt named by Freng? Yaroze86 (talk) 16:48, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
There is something I am attempting to understand. They placed Sagittarius A at the top of the star chart. This is the center of the galaxy. Did they move the area closer to the center, or did they omit the intervening space, or did they not know what Sagittarius A is?Memphis77 (talk) 16:15, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
I don't think we should take the Galactic barrier display for hard canon as we have seen the maps move in a 3d way. The way I look at it, is they use the Galaxy map in SNW, but more confined and used only as a visual representation but consider it only as a background image (viewing pleasure) and it constantly moves around. The way I look at that is the Galaxy and the Galactic barrier are one and the same (unified borders). They then bring the systems into a zoomed view so we the viewers can see how the galaxy is laid out but with the barrier in view (that really should be in the distance). Yaroze86 (talk) 16:26, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
New couple rows (I think???) [23] Yaroze86 (talk) 14:43, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
Is DENOBULA PRIME (83 LEONIS)? Yaroze86 (talk) 20:21, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
[24] Next 2 rows. Yaroze86 (talk) 21:21, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
Yes. Denobula Prime (β) The star charts from SFA are proving to be a minefield for those of us who seek consistency in the charts. Another puzzler - there is a system named Maluria Regulus.Memphis77 (talk) 21:37, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
I was looking at the pictures from Jörg Hillebrand's X account. I noticed in the pictures showing the 3-D star chart becoming a 2-D star chart some things ([25]; [26]
  • a. There is a location labeled as "Junk Planet" (yellow label). I looked up Junk Planet in Memory Alpha and Memory Beta, and I couldn't find anything. What is this place?
  • b. Another location labeled with a generic name is "Neutron Star". Which neutron star does this refer to?
  • C. Sagitarius A was shown to be a location within 150 light years of Sol, with systems like Tau Sagitarrii lying beyond this place. This is more noticeable in the second picture, which shows Sagitarrius A at the top of the chart. (This is what led to my earlier question about Sagittarius A.)Memphis77 (talk) 21:37, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
    I wonder if Junk Planet is one from DIS that had the Miranda looking Kit-bash or maybe one from Lower Decks? I'll look at these little bit and see if anything catches my eye. Yaroze86 (talk) 21:43, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
    At the moment I can only go out as far as Theta2 Microscopii (390 Light years) for real systems. The far north point on that map is where it is. [27]. Is they are going as far as Sagitarius A (center of the Milky Way) than anything is possible as its location. Yaroze86 (talk) 22:01, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
I think you are misunderstanding me. Perhaps I am being too polite? They moved Sagittarius A to be closer to Sol than it really is. It is no longer at the center of the galaxy. It is now between 100 and 150 light years from Sol; it is located closer to Sol than Tau Sagittarii is, which is approximately 122 light years away.Memphis77 (talk) 22:15, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
We shouldn't use the 3d map to determine location IMO until it's shown as a stationary map. I also don't think we should put Sagittarius A near Sol by any means. Because that map zooms around the locations that we know and without Sagittarius A. Yaroze86 (talk) 22:25, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
I am using this 2D map. Sagittarius A is at the top. [28] (Can you see the photo?)Memphis77 (talk) 22:50, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
Oooof..... Its not that far away..... [29] Yaroze86 (talk) 23:27, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
Should be able to get you a few new systems from this tho. Furthest south is Beta Tauri, North East is Zalkon, North is 3Ups Oph, NW is 16Lam Aql, west no real changes, South West MEGARA, South East TIBURON and Klothos. East is to Starbase 117 and Boradis Yaroze86 (talk) 00:09, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
This is what we are working with on the lower section. [30] Yaroze86 (talk) 01:11, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
Both Nigala and Bre'el appear in "Beta Test" on the Stellar Cartography laboratory star chart.Memphis77 (talk) 01:46, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
Difficulty with reading number. There is a deep space station near Ba'ku with a double-digit number. Can you help with this number?Memphis77 (talk) 19:10, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
Another K-7...... Different Icon though. Should have maybe another 2 rows today. Then I will start working on the zoomed out one. Yaroze86 (talk) 19:20, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
Thanks. They moved Boreth to a new location. It's now near Omega Leonis.Memphis77 (talk) 20:23, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
[31] 2 more rows. For K-7 could they combined or changed it to match DISCO season 1 Star chart? Side note, please ignore anything in the Klingon area for this. Didn't notice I included it.....Yaroze86 (talk) 20:39, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
Last of the Normal sized map. Everything here on out is the larger maps.
[32] Yaroze86 (talk) 02:35, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
The system below Donatu is labeled. It is Cursa (Beta Eridani).Memphis77 (talk) 06:33, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
Tau Sagittari is the furthest star "north" I have seen in the star charts. It is seen briefly on the 3D map. It was also mentioned in "Beta Test". There is a star system near it on the chart, which I believe starts with Xi.Memphis77 (talk) 06:43, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
I don't think there is a Starbase 95-Sierra. It looks to me like another case of duplication, this time Starbase 39-Sierra.Memphis77 (talk) 09:27, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
[33] Identified what I could atm at the top. Need to look around more and see if there are things in beta canon that might help identify some of these or from a Video game. Yaroze86 (talk) 20:18, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
In Ckaptir space, there might be a location marked for the Ckaptir homeworld. This is based on a similar situation with the Sarrotheyn Space, where their homeworld was shown to be in that space.Memphis77 (talk) 23:16, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
Could be that or Ckaptir II. Also ones that match the length of blob or ones from the Stalla/Star Charts I think are safe to include. The ones like 94 Aqu, I would wait on. Yaroze86 (talk) 00:02, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
There is a star system Ko'Zeine? (North of Icconia) I think this might be a duplication of R'ongovia.Memphis77 (talk) 17:49, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Qu'Vat lays between Rura Penthe and B'Moth.Memphis77 (talk) 23:40, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
K't'inga is 'north" of B'Moth.Memphis77 (talk) 23:46, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
To the right of Halee, there were Kostolain, Tessen, Moselina, Valt, Krios, Ikalia, and Starbase 36. Memphis77 (talk) 00:07, 22 March 2026 (UTC)
When we see the 3d chart becoming a 2d chart, I believe that they are using green text labels from "Red Directive". I have confirmed that many of the systems appear in both episodes, including Uncharted System 1702. North of Antos, there might be Hornish (Homeworld). This label appeared in "Red Directive".Memphis77 (talk) 01:54, 22 March 2026 (UTC):
Some of the locations (red circles) are stops made by the Eternal Archive over an approximate 500 year period. [34]Memphis77 (talk) 02:22, 22 March 2026 (UTC)
A somewhat close-up view of the area of the area occupied by the Ferengi Trade Zone and the First Federation and the area around Sherman's Planet. [35]
Starbase 3, below Mu Virginis, is Starbase 8. [36]Memphis77 (talk) 02:28, 22 March 2026 (UTC)
I think to the right of Hetemit there is Persephone, Rukari, Tychus, Kasar, and Majalis. Their locations have been moved "upwards".Memphis77 (talk) 02:37, 22 March 2026 (UTC)
Could Kappa Persei be below Tau Ursae Majoris? It seems to be that way on the Star Trek: Star Charts. And, somewhere down in that area, there is Delta Aurigae. It was mentioned in "Beta Test".Memphis77 (talk) 02:40, 22 March 2026 (UTC)
Give me a few and Ill post what I have for Klingon side of things. Trying to located these.... Persephone, Rukari, Tychus, Kasar, and Majalis Yaroze86 (talk) 04:51, 22 March 2026 (UTC)
[37] Klig area Yaroze86 (talk) 05:25, 22 March 2026 (UTC)
To the left of VANDEN is Da-dates and Skygowan Yaroze86 (talk) 05:40, 22 March 2026 (UTC)
Any ideas on the rest that is not filled in? Could it be more SNW stuff or something? Yaroze86 (talk) 14:24, 25 March 2026 (UTC)
I have been working on the real life stars heading out from Sol. I believed you missed the system to the "right" of Boreth. This would be Alhena (Gamma Geminorum).Memphis77 (talk) 23:58, 9 April 2026 (UTC)
I will add it. Thank you Yaroze86 (talk) 00:36, 22 April 2026 (UTC)