Objects
We seem to be pretty far into the weeds if we need individual pages for generic objects now. There's building the web, and then there's pulling string. Also, why didn't we start with simply "object" and build it out from there? - Archduk3 19:40, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
- I disagree with merging solid object and physical object together into an "object" page unless they are categorized on a general page like how different variants of quad are. A drop of water and a bubble of gas are physical objects, but they aren't solid objects. BradTheAmerican (talk) 20:06, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
I would fully expect any combined page to have sections for each type of object, it's just that a solid object is a type of physical object, and a physical object is a type of object. Seems silly to make people click around between pages for that info. - Archduk3 20:49, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
- Yea that makes sense. Either way works for me. BradTheAmerican (talk) 21:12, 16 July 2020 (UTC)